CANADA SKANDAL

⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓

Server 1 >>>

⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆⬆

 

Country - USA; Writer - Charles Randolph; Jay Roach; ; average ratings - 7 / 10; 109m. Bel muzik nan bon tan Haiti. The political scandal threatens to affect basic tenets of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's agenda for governing Canada. Neil Hall - Pool/Getty Images OTTAWA, Ontario — A political scandal is threatening to spoil Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeaus date with a second term. Trudeau, cast as a progressive golden boy and viewed internationally as a natural counterweight to President Donald Trump, now finds himself embroiled in a fast-spiraling series of events related to an alleged push to drop corruption charges against a major engineering company. Advertisement Trudeaus inner circle is accused of pressing Jody Wilson-Raybould, Canadas former justice minister and attorney general, to offer a Quebec company a settlement deal over charges that it bribed Libyas former Gaddafi regime. She was then demoted to Veterans Affairs' minister, criticized in the press and this week resigned. How ugly has it gotten? Wilson-Raybould announced in her resignation letter that shes hired a lawyer — a retired Supreme Court justice, no less — who she will consult before she comments on the affair publicly. Ahead of this week, Trudeau had a small lead in the polls — one prominent pollster had his party up four points. Liberals' main fear until now had been losing a few seats in Parliament and seeing Trudeaus second-term agenda stymied by a hostile legislature. Now its fretting about starker setbacks. Theres already an ethics inquiry underway. A parliamentary probe is next. Trudeaus allies agreed to the probe Tuesday, but fought feverishly to limit its scope. Theres no indication these events will turn into a full-blown legal threat: Analysts who have weighed in have mixed opinions on whether the events described could be called criminal obstruction. And Trudeau said he never pressed anyone into offering a plea deal to SNC-Lavalin, a generations-old employer in the prime ministers hometown of Montreal, which faces a serious threat over charges of corruption in Gaddafis Libya. “[I am] both surprised and disappointed by her decision. the prime minister said of Wilson-Raybould's resignation from the Cabinet, which followed a demotion. The political scandal threatens to affect basic tenets of his agenda for governing Canada. Trudeau has a mixed record on keeping his promises: Some hes achieved, such as a tax credit designed to reduce poverty. Others he has completely abandoned, including a promise to reform the election system. But two of Trudeaus most important promises remain a work in progress and could be washed out by the scandal's ripples. One is better relations with Canadas Indigenous people, a high enough priority that Trudeau devoted a U. N. General Assembly speech to it. The other is building a new pipeline through British Columbia to get Canadas land-locked oil to international markets. The mess has Trudeau fighting with the Indigenous leadership in the very province where he wants to build a pipeline, British Columbia, and he needs formal consent from aboriginal people to do it. B. C. chiefs excoriated Trudeau over the affair in aggressive language in a public letter. The reason its so personal: The minister at the center of the storm, Wilson-Raybould, is an Indigenous trailblazer. She was the first aboriginal woman to hold this prestigious cabinet post in Canada — and she underscored that personal point by signing her resignation letter in her Kwak'wala name: Puglaas. That translates to daughter of noble people. Her father, Bill Wilson, indeed has clout. Hes a well-known hereditary chief who used to spar with Trudeaus father, a former prime minister. In one such session, Wilson told Pierre Trudeau about his daughter Jodys big dreams. Now the younger Trudeau is feeling the ire of the elder Wilson, who blasted the Liberal government, saying it has no business taking credit for recent improvements for Indigenous Canadians. “Its make-believe, cosmetic baloney that Trudeaus engaged in. Its proven itself now to be a farce, ” Wilson told the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation this week. “The Liberals are slightly better [than the opposition Conservatives. But] I have no faith whatsoever — not that I ever did — in the white mans government. ” What Indigenous people want, he said, is real control over resources, land and pipelines. Thats where Trudeau's pipeline problem comes in. The prime minister is so desperate to build one he shelled out C 4. 5 billion for the public takeover of a project that has no guarantee of success. Its central to the grand bargain Trudeau offered Canadian voters in 2015: Trudeau promised that if Canadians accepted a tax on carbon emissions, that would buy the environmental goodwill to get some pipelines built. The carbon tax happened. The pipelines havent. Wilson has made his fierce opposition clear in a series of Facebook posts. So now Liberals are starting to sweat about the election. Expect an awkward meeting next week when the prime minister hosts the next gathering of his Liberal caucus. Wilson-Raybould remains part of that caucus. One parliamentary staffer in Trudeaus party said he expects lots of venting against the perceived shortcomings of the prime ministers entourage, though he expects any internal rebellion to fall well short of the toxic wars that nearly destroyed the Liberal party in the early 2000s. The “caucus will stay together for now, ” the staffer said. “Sometimes these types of crises can bring caucus members together. ” One sign the damage to Trudeau could be contained: The woman most often touted by Liberals as a possible leadership successor to him, Foreign Affairs Minister Chrystia Freeland, said shes still squarely supportive of the boss.

CANADA scandale. Vrhhhhhhhhh djuskam cim cujem😘😘😘. The cesspool of romancing Jihad. Four years ago, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) officially leveled corruption and fraud charges against Montreal engineering firm SNC-Lavalin, over alleged criminal acts that occurred while that firm was doing business in Libya. The  Globe and Mail  broke the biggest scandal since Canadas  Adscam scandal, which cost the Liberals dearly in election year 2006. This latest scandal, also breaking in an election year, has to do with the involvement of Justin Trudeau and the Prime Ministers Office (PMO) in the SNC-Lavalin case. SNC-Lavalin operates in a variety of sectors globally, including mining and metallurgy, oil and gas, and the fraud and corruption charges against it include nearly 48 million in payments made to Libyan government officials between 2001 and 2011. The case centers around Liberal MP Jody Wilson-Raybould (JWR) who served as Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada from 2015 until January 2019. She was then demoted in a cabinet shuffle to the position of Minister of Veterans Affairs, and suddenly resigned several days ago (February 12) following the  Globe and Mail  report, which alleged that the PMO “attempted to press” her to intervene in the corruption and fraud prosecution of SNC-Lavalin in her role as Attorney General, in order to spare the engineering giant — deemed to be a  crown jewel  in Quebec — from criminal prosecution. The story also indicated that she “came under heavy pressure. ” Now the Commons Justice Committee will look into whether JWR was subjected to any kind of pressure from Trudeau and/or the PMO. Meanwhile, Trudeaus principal secretary, Gerald Butts, has  suddenly quit. Butts is Trudeaus longtime friend, confidante and confidence booster, and some even say that Butts is his brains. Trudeau calls Butts “the core of his inner circle. ” The resignation was over the SNC affair. Criminal charges could also be laid against members of the PMO for obstruction of justice, if its interference is established. Doing Business with a Jihadist Government: There is another twist in the criminal case involving SNC Lavalin, and the alleged involvement by Justin Trudeau and the PMO: Libya. Between 2001 and 2011, a senior executive of SNC-Lavalin established “close ties” with Saadi Gaddafi, the son of the late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. The RCMP alleged that as the presidents son, Saadi Gaddafi “ was in a position of power and able to give a business advantage to SNC-Lavalin in Libya, ” and that he was  “a major recipient of SNCs largesse. ”   Court documents allege that the company offered “bribes worth 47. 7 million to one or several public officials of the ‘Great Socialist Peoples Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. ” Meanwhile, SNC-Lavalin was allegedly busy defrauding Libyan public agencies of “approximately 129. 8 million. ” Charges were laid by the RCMP against SNC executive Sami Bebawi and a former SNC executive vice president, Riadh Ben Aissa, who pleaded guilty to charges of corruption and money laundering relating to SNC-Lavalins Libyan operation. Aissa has since been extradited to Canada. It has also been claimed that SNC “ paid for lavish trips  and more for relatives of former Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi and even had some on payroll to ensure they got lucrative contracts. ” Saadi Gaddafi also has other unsavory personal baggage. He was  acquitted last year of murdering Bashir al-Rayani, former footballer and coach of Tripolis Al-Ittihad football club. But now Bashirs family intends to appeal Gaddafis acquittal, because they say “ we could not get justice under his fathers regime, we will get it now, Im confident! ” Some more background about the Libyan regime that SNC was allegedly wheeling and dealing with: Muammar Gaddafi seized power in Libya in a military coup detat in 1969. He was known for “ horrific human rights abuses, ” a supporter of jihad terror, “fervently Islamic and pro‐Palestine, ” and once  stated: “Christianity is not a faith for people in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas. Other people who are not sons of Israel have nothing to do with that religion… those believers who do not follow Islam are losers…. are here to correct the mistakes in the light of the teachings of the Koran. ” Gaddafi also declared that “ Iranians are our brothers”  and fed into the victimology narrative that America was the  great oppressor. So here is the Canadian government involved not only in possible obstruction of justice, but also in trying to cover up the links of SNC-Lavalin with the Gaddafi regime. As Trudeau scrambles to do damage control, it should be remembered that he has embraced  Islamic supremacists, as well as policies of open-door immigration, heedless of the costs of all this to taxpayers. Meanwhile, he perpetually downplays the  dangers of jihad, to the peril of Canadian citizens. Even the Liberal-leaning  CBC  noted that “in the week since the SNC-Lavalin story broke, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has changed his talking points several times, ” and now risks “brand damage. ” Between the Globe and Mail and the CBC, it doesnt look as if the 600, 000, 000 bailout package that Trudeau pledged to media, widely considered to be a  bribe  in an election year, is working in his favor.

CANADA sandals. Patrick Handal Skandal pou toujou. Le bon vieux temps de la nouvelle génération du compas. Ko je sad ova, menjaju se ministarke ko na traci Jebala vas KIJA. Objasnioo. 3:15 iscimala se malo zbog kera :D. Po starom proverenom receptu,bravo ti ga Aco. M elissa Mollen Dupuis watched from the sidelines as Greta Thunberg, the teenage Swedish climate activist, led hundreds of thousands of protesters in a climate strike through central Montreal last month. At the vanguard, a group of 30 indigenous and non-indigenous young people unfurled a banner that declared: “To the frontlines, for Mother Earth. ” Dupuis, a prominent indigenous rights and environmental activist from Quebec, had helped train those young men and women: part of a broader, grassroots effort to marry the two causes – climate crisis and indigenous rights – and raise a new generation of youth activists. As she saw them lead the march, she wept. “Those plants I grew, I was picking the fruits of that work, ” she said. “I see it growing bigger and bigger. ” The climate march in September drew half a million people, the largest demonstration in Montreals history. It was the culmination of a broader national conversation on the climate crisis and environmental policies ahead of a federal election later this month that may weaken the prime minister Justin Trudeaus hold on power. “This was a defining moment for a generation, ” said Professor Sylvie de Blois, the director of McGill Universitys school of environment, in Montreal. But the urgency of the national debate on what Canada can do to combat the climate crisis belies a broader failure by political leaders to address this and other generation-defining issues such as identity and systemic racism that have emerged in the course of a fractious and scandal-ridden election campaign. On the environment, racial injustice and indigenous rights, many feel Canadian political leaders have steadfastly chosen politics over policy, failing to address generational challenges that voters tell pollsters are at the top of their concerns. That gulf appears wider as the final stretch of the campaign leads into election day on 21 October. “In the last election we had a dream of hope of seeing real, profound change, ” said Dupuis. “[This] is an election of discontent. ” Perhaps nobody personifies this sense of disappointment more than Trudeau, who has been held up as a beacon of liberal values at a moment of resurgent authoritarianism around the world. His milestones in office, including raising child benefits, resettling thousands of Syrian refugees and a carbon tax, have now been overshadowed by revelations that he has previously donned the racist caricature of brown and blackface make-up, including while he was working as a teacher. Trudeau apologised for the incidents, which raised questions about systemic discrimination in a country that prizes its diversity, during the first election campaign in which a person of colour is running as leader of a federal party – Jagmeet Singh, the head of the left-leaning New Democratic party (NDP) who is a Sikh. In the weeks since the incident, Trudeau has continued to apologise but critics say he has not engaged in a serious reflection on racism, and the blackface scandal has largely retreated into the background. “Canadians and the media want to frame these things as just incidents, ” said Dr Cheryl Thompson, an academic who spent years studying the history of blackface in Canada, and is now an assistant professor at Ryerson University, in Toronto. “This was just an incident, so now its over, lets move on, lets go back to being Canadian. “For any black, brown, Asian, Muslim, you-name-it group, we dont move on. This is an everyday thing that we deal with. There is a disconnect. ” Trudeau has also had to fend off allegations of political interference in the judiciary after his aides pressured the former attorney general and highest-ranking indigenous official, Jody Wilson-Raybould, to reach a settlement with SNC-Lavalin, a Montreal-based company that was allegedly involved in bribery and corruption abroad, including in Muammar Gaddafis Libya. The treatment of Wilson-Raybould, who was expelled from the Liberal caucus, has served to underscore Trudeaus record on indigenous rights, which is replete with symbolic gestures and admissions of wrongdoing while promises such as clean water for indigenous communities go unfulfilled. Trudeaus conservative rivals, led by Andrew Scheer, appear likely to reduce the size of his majority but have been plagued by scandals of their own. Liberals dug out videos of Scheer speaking out against gay marriage and abortion, and the Globe and Mail newspaper revealed that the opposition leader was also a US citizen. None of the mainstream parties openly promote anti-immigrant sentiment, but they have taken pains to avoid criticising a secularism bill passed earlier this year in Quebec that prevents some public servants from wearing religious symbols such as yarmulkes, hijabs and turbans. The law is seen as discriminatory by many legal scholars but is popular in Quebec, the province with the second-largest number of electoral districts. The lack of a serious reckoning by political leaders on issues of identity and systemic discrimination raised in the campaign has lent a sense of missed opportunity to the election. “Were actually talking about the highest office in the country to which [the issue of race] is now attached, so its hard not to talk about it in some way, but I think generally speaking, there might be a lot of white Canadians who are just uncomfortable talking about race, ” said Thompson. “Race and racism are so complicated because it requires the person who is involved in the racial caricature to have a ‘come to Jesus moment, ” she said. “They actually have to have a moment of reckoning, of: ‘Why am I doing this? Oh, I think I might be racist. Where did that come from? ” That sense of disconnect and dashed expectations shows up in another key issue: the climate crisis. Polling data shows that a majority of Canadians consider fighting global heating to be a top priority for the next government, and a plurality rank it at the top of their electoral concerns, a groundswell of support for action that mirrors the turnout in the climate march. The Green party, which has subsequently experienced a surge in its support, has accused the Trudeau government of not doing nearly enough to limit emissions, and Trudeau has disappointed environmentalists by purchasing a pipeline that transfers oil from the province of Alberta to the west coast of Canada. Scheer, meanwhile, skipped the climate march altogether and has vowed to challenge the governments carbon pricing scheme, an attempt to curry favor with voters concerned about the economy in oil industry towns. Both top parties have proposed grandiose ideas to limit emissions, but few specifics on how these reductions will be achieved. “For the younger demographic, the environment is a defining issue in this election, ” said de Blois, the McGill University professor. “No matter who is going to take power in Canada this year, they will be held accountable by a generation who demand immediate actions and policies coherent with the challenges we face. ” Still, those who face systemic discrimination in Canada or are hoping for a real reckoning on epochal issues in government may have to wait until after 21 October. “Every four years it changes, but for us its the same Canada, ” said Dupuis. “Every promise made is undone by the next government. Its a bipolar Canada that were having to face every damn election. ” • This article was amended on 14 October 2019 to clarify that the secularism legislation prevents some, but not all, public servants from wearing religious symbols.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is embroiled in a major political scandal thats already tarnished his progressive image and could derail his premiership ahead of the October elections. Trudeau and his political allies have been accused of pressuring Canadas now-former minister of justice and attorney general, Jody Wilson-Raybould, to drop criminal corruption charges against the Quebec-based engineering company SNC-Lavalin. Instead, they wanted her to merely issue financial penalties, which would allow the company to avoid a 10-year ban on bidding on federal contracts. SNC-Lavalin is suspected of bribing the Libyan government during the regime of Muammar Qaddafi. News of the scandal went mainstream on February 7, 2019, when the Canadian outlet the Globe and Mail published a report of Trudeaus office trying to pressure Wilson-Raybould to meddle in the SNC-Lavalin case. But the controversy exploded last week when Wilson-Raybould testified before the judiciary committee in Canadas House of Commons. During her testimony, Wilson-Raybould said that Trudeau and his senior aides had embarked on a “consistent and sustained” effort to get her to interfere in the case against SNC-Lavalin. She described the pressure as inappropriate but said that in her opinion, it “was not illegal. ” Trudeau, for his part, has denied any wrongdoing. On Thursday, in a major press conference about the SNC-Lavalin affair, he blamed the problem on an “erosion of trust” between his office and Wilson-Raybould. Trudeau also defended himself by saying he was trying to protect the interests of Canadians and jobs, and said that he had believed that, at the time, Wilson-Raybould was still seeking advice on the SNC-Lavalin case — though the decision was ultimately hers to make. But the optics are still pretty terrible for the prime minister. Wilson-Raybould — a former prosecutor and indigenous woman who was once a symbol of Trudaeus diverse and gender-balanced cabinet — was moved out of her role as attorney general and justice minister in January, and effectively demoted to a different position in the cabinet as minister of veterans affairs. She resigned from the cabinet altogether on February 12, 2019, soon after the scandal broke. Trudeau, who became prime minister in 2015, has made transparency and openness a centerpiece of his leadership philosophy, and he enthusiastically embraced democratic values. He modeled his governing platform on promoting gender equality and indigenous rights. But his alleged pressure campaign and the eventual sidelining of Wilson-Raybould very much looks like a betrayal of those values. “This is the bloom off the rose of the prime minister, ” Jonathan Rose, a political science professor at Queens University in Ontario, told me. “Its challenging him on a couple of big fronts: gender equity, his progressive policies. Hes fallen back to earth. ” The scandal has dramatically affected Trudeaus public image and has rattled faith in his government, particularly after some high-profile resignations. This SNC-Lavalin debacle is unfolding in real time, but whether it will turn into a major election issue in October, or die out before then, is still unclear. Heres what you need to know. The SNC-Lavalin case predates Trudeau. But it turned into a scandal under his watch. SNC-Lavalin is a major engineering and construction firm based in Montreal, Quebec, with operations all over the world. In 2015, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) — Canadas police force — alleged that SNC-Lavalin paid bribes to members of the Libyan government, including former dictator Muammar Qaddafi, to the tune of CA48 million. Officials also alleged that SNC-Lavalin defrauded the Libyan government of nearly CA130 million — money that was tied to construction projects in the country from 2001 to 2011. SNC-Lavalin denied these charges, though it has a reputation for shady business practices abroad. But if found guilty in this Libyan case, the company would feel the consequences in Canada. Specifically, SNC-Lavalin would be barred from bidding on any Canadian government contracts for 10 years. This is a big deal. SNC-Lavalin is involved in some major infrastructure projects in Canada and employs about 9, 000 people in the country — a decade-long ban would be detrimental to its domestic business and could potentially result in serious job losses. And, as mentioned, SNC-Lavalin is based in Quebec. The company is seen as the provinces “crown jewel, ” according to the Canadian outlet CTV. Quebec is also a politically important state for Trudeaus Liberal Party and for the prime minister himself ( he represents a constituency there) ahead of a potentially tight federal election in October. This is the backdrop for the scandal, which broke in February when the Globe and Mail reported that Trudeaus office (often referred to as PMO, or the prime ministers office) pressured Wilson-Raybould to intervene in the criminal case against the company. They allegedly pressured her to ask prosecutors to pursue a “deferred prosecution agreement, ” which would result in financial penalties against the company rather than a formal prosecution — which would mean no 10-year ban. These types of deferred-action prosecutions are becoming pretty common in the United States for big corporations, but they were introduced in Canada just last fall. Reports in the Canadian press have indicated that SNC-Lavalin lobbied for this change in the law, and very likely hoped to take advantage of it. The report in the Globe and Mail relied on anonymous sources but implicated Trudeau and his close aides. The prime minister denied the allegation, and said that neither he nor anyone else in his office “was directed. to take a decision on this matter. ” To be clear, Trudeau didnt deny talking about the SNC-Lavalin case with his cabinet ministers, but he said hed never instructed anyone to interfere. Without getting too deep into Canadian politics, its important to point out that in Canada, attorney general and justice minister is one position held by one person, who is also an elected member of Parliament. So in her role as justice minister, Wilson-Raybould is a member of Trudeaus cabinet, and it might not be out of the ordinary for the prime minister to discuss legal policy, or even a political or economic problem like the SNC-Lavalin case, among his ministers. But since Wilson-Raybould is also the attorney general, she also has the final say over the countrys prosecutorial arm, which is supposed to be independent of political influence. (This scandal has revived calls to separate the two roles because of the inherent conflict, and Trudeau brought up this conflict at his Thursday press conference. ) Trudeau has admitted he discussed the SNC-Lavalin prosecution with Wilson-Raybould, but said there was no pressure campaign executed by him or anyone close to him, and hes said the decision on how to handle the company was “hers to make. ” Also, nothing changed practically: SNC-Lavalin still faces criminal charges. Theres a small wrinkle here, though. In early January, before the SNC-Lavalin story went public in February, Wilson-Raybould was moved in a cabinet reshuffle from the role of attorney general and justice minister — where she had served since 2015 — to the role of minister of veterans affairs, which was widely seen as a demotion. Law professor and Liberal MP David Lametti was named the new attorney general and justice minister. Cabinet reshuffles happen. But Wilson-Raybould was a key member of Trudeaus gender-balanced, diverse cabinet and a prominent indigenous leader in a government that promised better relations with Canadas indigenous population. The fact that she was replaced by a white man already didnt look great, but when reports that Trudeau and his office allegedly pressured Wilson-Raybould over SNC-Lavalin emerged, the personnel shift suddenly looked even worse. Or at least thats how the Conservative opposition, specifically leader Andrew Scheer, spun it. He argued that Trudeau demoted Wilson-Raybould because she didnt give in to his demands on SNC-Lavalin, though there isnt hard evidence of that. The scandal spiraled from there. Canadas independent ethics commissioner announced on February 11 that it would examine the allegations against Trudeau and his office, a probe the prime minister said he supported. The following day, February 12, Wilson-Raybould abruptly resigned from Trudeaus cabinet altogether. The House of Commons, Canadas legislative body, also decided to investigate. As the pressure intensified, Gerald Butts, a top adviser to Trudeau and a close friend and confidant of the prime ministers, quit his job as principal secretary on February 18. Butts was implicated in the alleged pressure campaign, and though he denied any involvement in a lengthy resignation letter, he said his presence had become a distraction in government. “Any accusation that I or the staff put pressure on the attorney general is simply not true, ” Butts wrote. “But the fact is that this accusation exists. It cannot and should not take one moment away from the vital work the prime minister and his office is doing for all Canadians. ” Wilson-Rayboulds testimony set off a firestorm This SNC-Lavalin scandal went into overdrive when Wilson-Raybould testified before the judiciary committee in Canadas House of Commons on February 27. The hearing was explosive. Wilson-Raybould told members of Parliament that between September and December 2018, she was the subject of a “consistent and sustained effort by many people within the government to seek to politically interfere in the exercise of prosecutorial discretion in my role as the attorney general of Canada. ” She called these attempts an “inappropriate effort” to secure a deferred prosecution agreement for SNC-Lavalin. Wilson-Raybould said these instances involved 11 people from the prime ministers office, the office of the privy council (the supposedly nonpartisan civil service) and the office of the finance minister. Altogether, Wilson-Raybould said, she or her staff participated in 10 meetings and 10 phone calls, along with emails and text messages, specifically about the SNC-Lavalin issue. She also took contemporaneous notes documenting these interactions. “Within these conversations, ” Wilson-Raybould testified, “there were expressed statements regarding the necessity of interference in the SNC-Lavalin matter, and] the potential of consequences and veiled threats” if a deferred prosecution agreement wasnt made available to the company. Wilson-Raybould also recalled the specifics of these interactions — including those she had with Trudeau directly. For example, on September 17, she said, she attended a meeting with Trudeau and the clerk of the privy council, Michael Wernick. At this meeting, which wasnt supposed to be about SNC-Lavalin, she said, Trudeau immediately brought it up. He told her that unless there was an agreement, SNC-Lavalin would move from Montreal, leading to potential job losses. Wilson-Raybould says she protested and told him she wasnt going to interfere, to which the prime minister repeated his concerns about job losses — and then brought up the upcoming Quebec provincial elections. Heres the relevant part of her testimony. the prime minister jumped in, stressing that there is an election in Quebec and that, “I am an MP in Quebec, the member for Papineau. ” I was quite taken aback. My response, and I vividly remember this as well, was to ask the prime minister a direct question while looking him in the eye. I asked: “Are you politically interfering with my role, my decision as the attorney general? I would strongly advise against it. ” The prime minister said: “No, no, no, we just need to find a solution. ” The clerk then said that he spoke to my deputy and she said that I could speak to the director. Over her hours-long testimony, Wilson-Raybould detailed these and other instances that all sounded pretty damning for Trudeaus office — and the rest of the government. And with her contemporaneous memos and potential email and phone records, it appears she has evidence to back up her claims. Yet Wilson-Raybould also made it clear that while she believed the pressure from the prime ministers office to be “inappropriate, ” it was not, in her opinion, illegal. Wilson-Raybould concluded her testimony by saying she saw herself as speaking truth to power. “I come from a long line of matriarchs, ” she said, referencing her First Nations background. “And Im a truth-teller, in accordance with the laws and traditions of our big house. This is who I am, and this is who I always will be. ” This is bad for Justin Trudeau. But how bad? Its too early to say. At a press conference on the SNC-Lavalin affair on Thursday, the prime minister blamed the issue on a lack of trust between his office and Wilson-Raybould. He also doubled down on the point that the SNC-Lavalins criminal prosecution could have resulted in big job losses in Canada, and it was his responsibility to weigh those matters of significant national interest. “Each of these interactions was a conversation among colleagues about how to tackle a challenging issue, ” Trudeau said. “Each came at a time when my staff and I believed that the former minister of justice and attorney general was open to considering other aspects of the public interest. However, I now understand that she saw it differently. ” Trudeau said he regretted that erosion of trust, but once again denied inappropriate pressure. “I can assure Canadians there was no breakdown in the rule of law, integrity of institutions, ” he said. But the prime minister also skirted the question on Wilson-Rayboulds removal from her job as attorney general and justice minister in January i n the cabinet reshuffle, saying “there are many lessons to be learned and many things we would have liked to have done differently. ” The remarks by the prime minister came a day after Gerald Butts, the prime ministers former principal secretary who resigned in February, testified before the House of Commons in a high-profile hearing. He largely contradicted Wilson-Rayboulds version of events, saying Trudeau didnt place inappropriate pressure on her and just wanted her to seek outside advice. Butts said Trudeau wanted “to make sure the thousands of people whose jobs were and, it bears repeating, are at risk, were at the forefront of our minds at all times. ” “If anything could be done to protect those innocent people, ” Butts continued, “we were told to work with the professional public service to make sure that option would be given every due consideration. ” He also said the prime minister never asked or directed Wilson-Raybould to seek a deferred prosecution agreement. “It was and is the attorney generals decision to make, ” Butts testified. He denied that the cabinet reshuffle, and Wilson-Rayboulds position change, had anything to do with SNC-Lavalin. Taken together, Trudeaus remarks and Butts testimony argue that their intentions were well-placed, since the government wanted to protect jobs — and this was mostly a failure to communicate. But it seems unlikely the immense political pressure on Trudeau will ease up anytime soon. Conservative politicians are calling for his resignation and are demanding a criminal investigation by Canadas police force. After Trudeau spoke on Thursday, Conservative leader Andrew Scheer called the real “erosion of trust” as one between Trudeau and Canadians. “What we heard from Justin Trudeau was an attempt to justify and normalize corruption. Its clearer than ever that inside his government, political interference and contempt for the rule of law are a matter of course, ” Scheer wrote on Twitter. “This is a PM who has lost the moral authority to govern. ” Its a potent talking point — but its still far too early to say how this will end for Trudeau and Canadas Liberals. Sarah Goldfeder, a principal at the Earnscliffe Strategy Group and a fellow at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, told me that right now this case reeks of “ickiness, ” but not necessarily illegality. This is backed up by Wilson-Rayboulds testimony — again, at least at present. “Its really important to remember Wilson-Raybould said very clearly there was nothing illegal going on, there was no violation of the law, ” Queens Universitys Rose said. More information could certainly come out that might change this equation. Trudeau and his advisers are occupying a very murky area here, and even in the best interpretation — that Trudeau was making his desires known but ultimately left the decision up to his attorney general — is still problematic. Questions also remain about others in his government and their involvement in this alleged pressure campaign. “Its quite possible that some people could be charged with obstruction of justice for trying to stop the prosecution, ” Duff Conacher, co-founder of the government accountability group Democracy Watch and an adjunct professor of law and politics at the University of Ottawa, told me. The biggest problem for Trudeau right now may be that this scandal is extremely off-brand. He wasnt supposed to be this kind of politician, which is why this controversy has resonated so strongly. Its undermined Trudeaus image as a positive, progressive politician — his “sunny ways” style of politics. Wilson-Raybouds testimony of “veiled threats” and being “barraged” by senior officials contrasts sharply with the image of a transparent, accountable government and a prime minister who promised integrity and honesty. For many Canadians, Trudeau, as a prominent political columnist said, is now an “imposter. ” “It certainly shows that their government isnt any better than any other government, ” Lori Hausegger, a political science professor and the head of the Canadian Studies program at Boise State University, told me. And the allegations that the prime minister pressured a respected female indigenous minister, then appeared to demote her, undercuts the image of his “values-based government, ” as Goldfeder called it. Gender equality and indigenous rights are anchors of that agenda. “This is a prime minister whos prided himself on having gender equity in his cabinet. This a prime minister whos called himself a feminist. This is a prime minister whos eager to deal with reconciliation with our indigenous peoples, and hes hung out an indigenous cabinet minister, Wilson-Raybould, to dry, ” Rose said. “So the optics are brutal for all those reasons. ” And those optics have only gotten worse this week. On Monday, Treasury Board president Jane Philpott quit, saying shed lost confidence in the government in the wake of the SNC-Lavalin scandal. Philpott, a close ally of Wilson-Raybould, was another highly respected, key female member of Trudeaus cabinet. To the incomparable @janephilpott, truly the #MOC... almost 4 years our country has witnessed your constant & unassailable commitment to always doing what is right & best for Cdns. You are a leader of vision & strength & I look forward to continuing to work alongside you. ❤️U. — Jody Wilson-Raybould ( Puglaas) March 4, 2019 Experts say Philpotts resignation is a very big deal. Its symbolically bad (just check out Wilson-Rayboulds tweet) and, practically, could be very destabilizing to Trudeaus government. “Thats just going to compound it for him because shes resigning based on ethics, and she was a central cabinet minister for him, ” Conacher said. Looming over all this is Canadas approaching 2019 federal elections. Its not clear yet how deeply this scandal has penetrated beyond the Ottawa political bubble, but again, its early days. A recent Ipsos poll taken after Wilson-Rayboulds testimony gave Conservatives their biggest edge since the last election. That same poll found that more than two-thirds of respondents believed Wilson-Rayboulds version of events, compared to just about a third who believed Trudeau. Trudeau, at this point, doesnt seem likely to resign so close to the elections; if he did, it would likely throw his party into chaos. The ethics investigation will play out, and while that may be damning for Trudeau, the probe will likely take months and may not conclude before the October elections. So the answer to how this scandal ends, and what it means for Trudeau, is simply, as one expert put it, “We dont know yet. ”.

0:10 cómete la papa y déjame aquí oí esa mamada hahhaha. Dobro nam dosla Jovana! 💝 falila si. The pacific scandal canada. Aleksa nije to tvoj stil pevanja,vracaj se brzo vikli smo mi na tvoje pesme,ne ovaj sunt sto odpeva. Good nostalgie. Canada donut scandal trevor noah.

Bravo za Jovanu,ona je prava uz Ministarke. Top. Canada goose scandal. Canada goose daunen skandal. Canada goose jacket scandal. Canada goose skandal. CANADA sandales. Edita na aparatima 😂😂.

Thanks for visiting Your Own a car in 2 I have to do so in cas A new survey of this email We have

Canadian scandal 2019. Svaka cast lepo Pozdrav Thank you/Merci/Hvala: 🙏👍 Miodrag/Michel Srbin/francuz. YouTube. Love that song so much, but I don't understand anything 😅😂. Christ embassy canada scandal. Կանադայի վարչապետը հնդկական է պարում (տեսանյութ) Կանադայի վարչապետը Հնդկաստան կատարած այցի ժամանակ հնդկական տարազ է հագել ու պարել է Նյու Դելիում դիվանագիտական Հայուհին ապշեցրել է կանադական The Voice-ի ժյուրիին, այդ թվում՝ Լառա Ֆաբիանին և Գարուին (տեսանյութ) 18-ամյա Միրիամ Բաղդասարյանը հաջողությամբ հաղթահարել է կանդական The Voice (La Voix) նախագծի կույր լսումներ փուլը. նա հիացրել է. Canada scandal 2018. Usa skandal. Bravo Jole! ❤️. The scandal surrounding Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shows just how cozy the countrys elite really is. Ms. Gerson is a Canadian political journalist. March 6, 2019 Credit. Justin Tang/Associated Press CALGARY, Alberta — There is a particularly quaint element to Canada — our smallness, our politeness, our insularity — that makes many people, including many Canadians, assume the best about our country and ourselves. As if these qualities make us inherently purer than other, more populous countries. Its true that Canadians are a trusting, generous lot who generally believe in the greater good, institutions and the rule of law. Consequently, the country is prone to imagining itself more bound by a mythology of its own goodness than it actually is. But theres a darker side to Canadas smallness. Our tiny network of political, business and intellectual elite is insular and concentrated. The scandal now enveloping Prime Minister Justin Trudeau — a bilingual, feminist, pro-multicultural liberal who embodies much of what we like to celebrate in our national character — should put an end to this. At its heart, the SNC-Lavalin scandal that threatens Mr. Trudeaus leadership is about political interference in our judicial system. The Globe and Mail first reported in early February that last fall, the prime minister and his office pressured Jody Wilson-Raybould, then the justice minister and attorney general, to seek a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, which is equivalent to a plea bargain, for SNC-Lavalin, a politically well-connected civil engineering firm based in Montreal. [Want more Canadian coverage in your inbox? Sign up for the Canada Letter newsletter. SNC-Lavalin has been at the center of corruption scandals for decades. (In 2013, the World Bank debarred the company and more than 100 of its affiliates for 10 years, single-handedly putting Canada at the top of the banks corruption list. In this latest scandal, the company faces criminal charges for bribing Libyan officials, including Muammar el-Qaddafis son, with millions of dollars to secure contracts in Libya. The Deferred Prosecution Agreement would permit SNC-Lavalin to avoid criminal prosecution, allowing it to continue to bid for domestic government contracts. Without this, the company might face existential peril. The only person in Mr. Trudeaus cabinet who seemed to push back was Ms. Wilson-Raybould. In January, she was put in charge of the veterans affairs ministry, effectively a demotion. Last week, she went public, speaking before a House of Commons committee about the pressure shed been under to cut a deal with SNC-Lavalin. For hours, she delivered extensive testimony, citing notes and texts, detailing inappropriate levels of political interference in a criminal proceeding. Her account was impossible to reconcile with Mr. Trudeaus previous flat denials. The prime minister and his defenders have come across as weak and dishonest, more interested in protecting a Quebec-based corporation than in the independence of the judiciary. His government is now in chaos. On Monday, one of his key cabinet ministers, Jane Philpott, resigned, saying she had “lost confidence in how the government has dealt with this matter and in how it has responded to the issues raised. ” Mr. Trudeau came to power in 2015 on the promise of a new, revitalized Liberal Party, removed from the stale old boys club of yore. The party, though it imagines itself as representing the quintessential ideals of Canadiana, has a long track record of corruption and chicanery, particularly in Quebec. With an electoral base in the countrys most heavily populated regions, like Quebec, the Liberals have enjoyed many decades in power. It is not without merit that they are referred to, derisively, as Canadas Natural Governing Party. Power brings with it certain habits. This is true everywhere, but in a democratic country with a population the size of California spread across a gigantic landmass, influence runs in a geographic network that we describe in shorthand as the Laurentian Elite, after the St. Lawrence River that runs through eastern Canada. Mr. Trudeau, the son of former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, is very much a creature of this elite. And so is SNC-Lavalin. Not just any company gets its calls taken by the prime ministers office. Founded in 1911, SNC-Lavalin is a crown jewel in the Quebec corporate firmament. The companys lobbyists have long ties in both Conservative and Liberal governments. Its lawyers include a former Supreme Court justice. A retired senior federal official is on its board. One of its corporate directors also sits on the board of the Trudeau Foundation. Quebecs public pension funds own about 20 percent of SNC-Lavalins shares. The decision about SNC-Lavalins case was being made in the lead-up to Quebecs Oct. 1 provincial election — and that was apparently on the prime ministers mind. According to Ms. Wilson-Rayboulds testimony, senior staff members from Mr. Trudeaus office said the company was threatening to relocate to London if it did not get the plea deal. One such staffer, she said, told her “if they dont get a D. P. A., they will leave Montreal, and its the Quebec election right now, so we cant have that happen. ” Ms. Wilson-Raybould recounted a conversation with Mr. Trudeau: “At that point the prime minister jumped in, stressing that there is an election in Quebec and that ‘I am an M. in Quebec — the member for Papineau, ” she said. When she asked if he was trying to override her independence as attorney general, she said, the prime minister replied, “‘No, no, no, we just need to find a solution. ” Ms. Wilson-Raybould was the first First Nations person to be appointed justice minister. She is a member of Parliament from Vancouver, British Columbia, to boot. By virtue of this background, she is not someone who has been historically well represented in the cozy corridors of Canadian power. Why should she care about SNC-Lavalin? Why would she stake her independence and her reputation on the companys survival? Its no coincidence that she was replaced at the justice ministry by David Lametti, a member of Parliament from Montreal who even now has not ruled out saving SNC-Lavalin with a Deferred Prosecution Agreement. The rule of law is a very grand Canadian virtue until, it seems, it proves to be a barrier to Liberal electoral prospects in Quebec. It is a small country, after all. Jen Gerson. JenGerson) a contributing editor to Macleans magazine who writes regularly for the CBC and The Walrus, is a co-host of the Canadian politics podcast “ Oppo. ”.

This month, Canadians will go to the polls to elect a new Parliament and prime minister. What had been shaping up to be a relatively staid affair has been thrown into turmoil after old photos showing Prime Minister Justin Trudeau wearing black- and brownface were made public. The revelations forced Trudeau to make a public apology last month: “It was something that I didnt think was racist at the time, but now I recognize it was something racist to do, and I am deeply sorry, ” he said. As election day nears, weve gathered our best pieces on Trudeau and his accomplishments and shortcomings in office. Trudeaus prime ministership started in 2015, after his party won a surprise blowout in national elections. The “victory caught many off guard, ” Foreign Policy correspondent Reid Standish wrote at the time, and it could be seen as a major victory for Canadian progressives. But “the Liberals return to dominance, ” he noted, “has as much to do with anti- Prime Minister Stephen] Harper opinion as it does with a well-strategized campaign. ” To be sure, Trudeau did put forward a very clear and very liberal agenda. Richard G. Miles of the Center for Strategic and International Studies points to his promises to “increase budget deficits by 25 million over the next 3 years to ‘invest in infrastructure and the middle class, ” to legalize marijuana, and to take in 25, 000 Syrian refugees. But there were also areas of overlap between Trudeaus campaign pledges and the policies of the conservative Harper government, according to the writer Matthew Bondy. “Both advocate for strong bilateral ties with the United States and both believe the Keystone XL pipeline should be part of that relationship. Both leaders are free traders, ” and both, he concludes, “believe humanitarian considerations should animate Canadian foreign policy, whether through Harpers maternal health initiatives or, for Trudeau, through enhanced development goals. ” Meanwhile, the new prime minister faced early rumblings that his liberalism may be more style than substance. As a diverse cabinet was sworn in in November 2015, the political writer Mitchell Anderson argued, it was “hard not to suspend critical thought in the face of such overpowering optics. ” But “Canadas progressives should always ensure there is real change behind the rhetoric, ” Mitchell warned. And on that score, “the incoming government should be under no illusions that Trudeaus winning smile will carry the day with a country weary from years of tactical politics and partisan self-interest. ” On domestic policy, Trudeau worked quickly to reassure his critics. Right away, he announced that his country would begin welcoming more refugees from Syria, to total 25, 000 by Febuary 2016. Not only that, he made plans to meet them as they arrived, Standish reports. He also changed course on climate change. The new prime minister, the author Andrew Nikiforuk argues, “ended the censorship of scientists and personally played a prominent role at the recent Paris COP21 conference on climate change” (even though he did not stop promoting the development of oil export pipelines. Meanwhile, he made moves to make good on his campaign promise to legalize marijuana, Foreign Policy s Robbie Gramer notes. Trudeau started putting his stamp on Canadian foreign policy as well. He had friendly meetings with U. S. President Barack Obama, writes the Canadian political commentator J. J. McCullough. But with Obama soon to leave office, the bromance was short-lived. And, as McCullogh warned in March 2016, “none of Obamas likely successors appears a natural soulmate for Canadas leader. The gap separating a substantial stateswoman like Hillary Clinton from the idealistic and untested Justin Trudeau seems vast, and the prime minister has already said he has ‘nothing but condemnation for the divisive nationalism of Donald Trump. ” When Trump won the U. presidential election, U. -Canadian relations were thrown into turmoil. “The two leaders, ” argued the journalist Michael Petrou in November 2016, “could not be more different. ” Rather than refusing to work with Trump, though, Petrou urged Trudeau to see a silver lining: “[I]ts likely that a Trump presidency will burnish Trudeaus image at home and around the world. Canadas prime minister has already spent his first year in office painting himself as a defender of liberal values and globalization — elevating Canadas profile on the international stage in the process. ” Soon enough, Trump and Trudeau met, and the occasion went well enough. As Gramer and the reporter Emily Tamkin write, “Trudeau seemed to deliver a message to the Trump administration: We wont disrespect your policies on immigration, with which we disagree, if you dont disrespect us on trade. ” But trade quickly became a sticking point in bilateral relations as the Trump administration insisted on a renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Trump promptly slapped tariffs on Canadian steel and aluminum, prompting Trudeaus foreign minister, Chrystia Freeland, to warn of a “ dollar-for-dollar response ” in return. The Trump administration, meanwhile, continued to lambast Canada for its trade protectionism in the dairy sector, which, as the Quillette editor Jonathan Kay points out, was far from fake news. “It is sometimes the case in politics that even the most cynical and ignorant politician may, by sheer happenstance, stumble accidentally into wisdom. And though Canadians dont like to admit it … this is the case with Trumps attacks on Canadas dairy racket. ” Eventually, Canada, Mexico, and the United States did come to an agreement on trade. As Kay explains, it made strategic sense for Canada to make a deal, although doing so would mark the end of Trudeaus honeymoon in office. “For more than two years as prime minister, ” Kay wrote in 2018, “Trudeaus government has seemed to defy gravity. But now there are signs that it is finally being brought down to earth. New polling data indicate that support for Trudeaus Liberal Party government is now at just 36 percent — the lowest since the 2015 election and only three points higher than the opposition Conservatives. ” At issue were a number of controversies—from the Trudeaus appearing in a parade of traditional Indian outfits during a trip to India to their attendance at a dinner with a Sikh extremist to the prime ministers apparent intervention in a case involving the Canadian engineering firm SNC-Lavalin. Trudeaus fall from grace was impressive but not wholly unexpected. As the essayist Stephen Marche put it, the prime ministers self-immolation is “rooted in the way it came to power, through virtue optics and social media, ” a political technique that “comes at a cost, and the cost is the need to appear pure. ” By early October, weeks before Canadas national elections, Trudeaus approval ratings had fallen below Trumps as images of him wearing black- and brownface were made public. Suddenly, his reelection was in doubt. And it wasnt just the string of embarrassments and scandals that put him in danger. Trudeaus legislative failures, according to the freelance journalist Charlie Mitchell, did too. “Legalizing cannabis had excited millennials, but that same constituency saw his decision to ditch plans for a more proportional electoral system as a betrayal, ” Mitchell writes. And “his purchase of the Trans Mountain pipeline from Kinder Morgan for about 3. 4 billion—to carry oil from Alberta to British Colombia and from there to international markets—enraged environmentalists and indigenous communities whose reservations dot the pipelines route. ” To be sure, it isnt as if Trudeaus rivals in the Conservative Party were offering more appealing fare. “All in all, ” Kay notes, “this is shaping up to be the most intellectually vacuous election campaign in Canadian history—a steady stream of pops and buzzes that seem primarily geared toward harvesting likes on social media. ” With the dumbing down of Canadian politics, he argues, this election “reveals what happens when countries run low on big things to argue about. Instead of political life simmering down into calm and rational discussion over the few remaining issues, the opposite happens: Politicians and pundits tribal instincts are channeled into invented scandals and symbolic issues with little connection to voters lived reality. ”.

CANADA standalone. CANADA skandar keynes.

Odlično kralju, odlično ❤! 😌✌🙂

Bravo, ovo je spoj ovo su Ministarke. Bravo Jovana, dobrodošla tamo gdje pripadas 👏👏👏. Bravo Mia,pesma ti je dobra. Љ ћ 😜😜😜. Canada goose pelz skandal. CANADA scandales. There are four fantastic acting performances in this film, Theron, Robbie, Kidman and Lithgow. Lithgow is so good, that only at the end of the film did I remember, that it was an actor at all. It reminded me of Christian Bale in Vice, so good, so convincing, you forget there is another person under the make up. Meanwhile, Robbie is such an incredibly versatile actress, her body acting is outstanding. Kidman was strong, and Theron is Megyn Kelly. She's so similar I actually forgot what Kelly looked like in real life for the duration of the film.
The plot is strong, well formulated and fairly easy to follow. There is a fair bit of law lingo, but it should be reasonably easy to follow. I've seen some reviewers complain they struggled to follow the plot, which in all honesty, is bizarre. Watching this film and not knowing names like Bill O'Reilly and Rupert Murdoch is like going to watch Jurassic Park and complaining you don't recognise the dinosaurs, it's up to you to understand the basics. You can't expect a mature film with a complex story to spoon feed you everything.
I don't remember a soundtrack, so I assume it fitted well and was used in all the right places.
The CGI editing was really strong. A bunch of times you find the actors pasted in to existing Fox footage and it's very impressive.
I really enjoyed the film. It was objectively good, with very strong acting and a shocking story. There is nothing major for anyone that isn't an angry or sad to complain about. It's just a solid film.
So try to ignore the silly scores of 1-4, this isn't one of the worst films ever made, by any stretch of the imagination.
I knew reasonably little of the "Fox News Scandal" before my viewing of Bombshell. So I was really surprised to find such a moving and compelling story focussing on house hold names from the states.

Napooookooon ministarke kakoo trebaaa ❤❤ inaace pesmaaa je vrh! ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Hahaha,na 0:17 isto kao da kaže drkali. ‘Its a wonderful day: 55 new Canadian citizens welcomed in Halifax The event was held on National Flag of Canada Day, marking the 55th anniversary of the Canadian flag. Continue reading  → COVID-19: Canadians quarantined at CFB Trenton ‘healthy says chief medical officer A total of 398 people evacuated by Canada from Wuhan, China, the epicentre of the outbreak, are now under quarantine at the base. Continue reading  → Weston home a total loss after Valentines Day fire: Winnipeg Fire Paramedic Service A Weston home is expected to be torn down after a blaze tore through a one-and-a-half storey house on the 2200 block of Gallagher Avenue Friday evening. Continue reading  → Wetsuweten solidarity protesters block rail lines in Vaughan The demonstration occurred as Federal Indigenous Services Minister Marc Miller met with members of the Mohawk First Nation near Belleville, Ont., where a rail blockade has entered its 10th day. Continue reading  → Quebec couple on quarantined Japanese cruise ship test positive for COVID-19 The couples daughter told The Canadian Press in an interview that Diane and Bernard Menard, both 75 years old, called around 2:30 a. m today to inform the family. Continue reading  → Canada still ‘assessing Diamond Princess situation as U. S. evacuates its citizens The federal government said their Canadian Embassy in Japan was working to provide consular support to all 255 Canadians on board. Continue reading  → Home invasion suspects armed with bear spray, machete, airsoft gun: Saskatoon police By Brady Ratzlaff Digital Broadcast Journalist Three men are facing charges after a home invasion at an apartment building Friday evening in Saskatoon. Continue reading  → COMMENTARY: Amid blockades, Trudeau needs to borrow a page from his father and show resolve Justin Trudeaus reaction to the blockades illustrates the stark contrast between him and his father, says Rob Breakenridge. Continue reading  → Emergency crews respond to fire at Pincher Creek hotel By Adam MacVicar Digital Journalist RCMP and fire crews were called to the King Edward Hotel in Pincher Creek at 4 a. m. on Saturday. Continue reading  → Load More.

Who listens to it like me in 2020, please give me a like. Canada scandal. Very nice music. 😎❤. IMPERIA BOG OTAC ESTRADE. Canadian scandal.